The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G appeared on the European market in September 2021. It fits in our Premium ($600-799) segment and accordingly comes packed with all kinds of attractive features. Let’s take a look at some of its key battery test results.
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 4500 mAh
- 65W charger
- 6.5-inch, 1080 x 2400, 90 Hz OLED display
- Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) chipset
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 12 GB
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G
130
battery
99
Honor X7b
Best: Honor X7b (221)
116
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)
137
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)
148
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)
158
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)
155
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
141
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
Key performances
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
7h37 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking

64
th
6. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
14. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
15. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
142
34. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
137
35. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
45. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
134
45. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
49. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
49. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
64. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
64. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
130
66. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
66. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
75. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
127
84. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
92. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
92. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
102. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
118
102. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
118
107. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
107. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
115. Crosscall Stellar-X5
115
119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
114
119. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
114
124. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
128. Motorola Moto G62 5G
112
132. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
132. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
138. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
109
138. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
109
142. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
146. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
146. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
107
148. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
152. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
155. Motorola moto g34 5G
102
159. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
159. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
161. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
161. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
166. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
166. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
166. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
171. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
171. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
175. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
178. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
178. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
178. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
183. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
185. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
185. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
188. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
189. Motorola moto g54 5G
90
189. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
195. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
197. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
201. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Position in Premium Ranking

4
th
2. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
4. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
25. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
26. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
31. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
38. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
40. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Pros
- Good charging time, reaching 80% in 22 minutes
- Excellent charging efficiency
- Above-average autonomy for its segment
- Good linearity (reliable battery charge indicator)
Cons
- High power consumption during nights and in idle mode
- High residual power consumption when device is still plugged in
- No wireless charging available
As of this writing, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G has the best battery performance in the Premium segment.
We compared the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G’s performance in several key categories with two other devices in our Premium segment, the OnePlus 9 and the Xiaomi Mi 11; battery capacity, tested charger, display type and resolution, and processor specifications for the three devices are shown in the table below.
|
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G |
OnePlus 9 |
Xiaomi Mi 11 |
Battery capacity (mAh) |
4300 |
4500 |
4600 |
Charger |
65W
(no wireless) |
65W
(wireless 15W) |
55W
(wireless 50W) |
Display type |
OLED |
OLED |
OLED |
Display resolution |
2400 x 1080 |
2400 x 1080 |
3200 x 1400 |
Chipset |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
Autonomy (62)
How long a battery charge lasts depends not only on battery capacity but also on other aspects of the phone’s hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (1) Stationary, (2) On the go, and (3) Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
68h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
48h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
30h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G achieves the best overall autonomy among its competitors, thanks in particular to its excellent performance in calibrated mode.
However, the OnePlus 9 delivers 5 more hours of moderate-use autonomy than the Oppo device, thanks to lower discharge current during the night and in on the go testing. Although the Xiaomi Mi 11 has a larger battery capacity (4600 mAh) than the other two devices, the Reno6 Pro 5G provides 9 hours more autonomy, mainly due to its lower screen resolution and better power optimization across the board. (The Mi 11 is of course even further behind the OnePlus 9.)
In terms of linearity, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G has very good behavior: when its indicator shows 20% of the charge remaining, there is actually 23.9% left.
Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

162
nd
10. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
78h
11. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
13. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
21. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
29. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
33. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
69h
34. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
69h
36. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
38. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
41. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
67h
42. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
48. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
50. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
53. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
59. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
62. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
63. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
68. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
87. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
94. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
56h
96. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
97. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
100. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
110. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
54h
111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
54h
115. Motorola moto g54 5G
53h
117. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
53h
123. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
52h
134. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
51h
138. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
139. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
145. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
147. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
148. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
153. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
49h
155. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
156. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
157. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
158. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
160. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
162. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
165. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
166. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
167. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
168. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
170. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
46h
171. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
173. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
178. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
181. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
183. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
184. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
186. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
188. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
189. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
191. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
192. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
195. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
198. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
200. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Position in Premium Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

27
th
20. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
22. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
27. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
29. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
39. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Stationary
Vivo Y72 5G
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
Both the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G and the OnePlus 9 have the same battery capacity (4500 mAh) and perform very similarly in TUS (57 hour 12 minutes vs. 57 hours 24 minutes, respectively), far outdistancing the Xiaomi Mi 11’s roughly 40 hours. While the Reno6 Pro 5G shows a drop of 2.67% at night, the Mi 11 loses 3.5% at night.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
On the go
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outside and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary for each device.
The Reno6 Pro 5G does very well for 3G calls, particularly compared to other products in the premium segment (including the competitors in this review), though it lags slightly behind for camera use.
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
Calibrated
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G delivers a strong performance in all calibrated use cases.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
Charging (103)
The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, Full charge and Quick boost. Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long it takes to charge a battery from zero to 80% capacity and from 80 to 100%; and measure how long and how much power the battery takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual full charge. With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes.
Unlike its competitors, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G does not offer wireless charging.
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
Full charge
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (121)
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G puts in an excellent wired charging performance, reaching 80% in 22 minutes — a difference of less than a minute between it the OnePlus 9, with both devices endowed with the same battery capacity and a 65W charger. The Xiaomi Mi 11 takes more than 30 minutes to reach an 80% charge.
Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

24
th
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
24. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
75. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
0h37
76. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
80. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
0h38
81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
84. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
86. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
93. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
0h42
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
102. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
0h46
103. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
104. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
108. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
0h48
109. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
110. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
0h49
114. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
117. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
119. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
121. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
0h51
122. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
123. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
125. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
127. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
128. Apple iPhone 12 mini
0h52
129. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
0h52
130. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
132. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
133. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
135. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
136. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
139. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
139. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
141. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
0h54
142. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
0h54
143. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
0h54
144. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
145. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
0h56
146. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
147. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
150. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
151. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
152. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
153. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
159. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
163. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
169. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
175. Motorola moto g34 5G
1h12
177. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
180. Crosscall Stellar-X5
1h20
183. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
186. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
188. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
189. Motorola moto g54 5G
1h26
190. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
191. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
198. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Position in Premium Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

11
th
11. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
23. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
28. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
29. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
30. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
31. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
33. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
35. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
Quick boost
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G leads the pack at all stages (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%) in our 5-minute quick boost charging tests, offering on average more than 7 hours 30 minutes of autonomy vs, 6 hours 50 minutes for the OnePlus 9 and at best just over 3 hours (at 40%) for the Xiaomi Mi 11.
|
| Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) | OnePlus 9 | Xiaomi Mi 11 |
Autonomy boost (hh:mm) | 20% | 8:54 | 8:26 | 2:52 |
40% | 7:32 | 5:59 | 3:09 |
60% | 5:39 | 5:28 | 2:54 |
80% | 4:08 | 4:02 | 1:51 |
Percentage boost | 20% | 23.8 % | 23 % | 11.2 % |
40% | 20.2 % | 16.3 % | 12.3 % |
60% | 15.1 % | 14.9 % | 11.3 % |
80% | 11.1 % | 11 % | 7.3 % |
Energy consumed | 20% | 5042 mWh | 4923 mWh | 2674 mWh |
40% | 4272 mWh | 3491 mWh | 2945 mWh |
60% | 3206 mWh | 3188 mWh | 2709 mWh |
80% | 2344 mWh | 2354 mWh | 1735 mWh |
Efficiency (95)
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario testing, outdoor mobility testing, charging evaluation, and power measurements, and then take into consideration the device’s battery capacity.
The Oppo Reno 6 Pro is among the most efficient devices in our database and in its segment.
Charge up
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
Among its rivals, on the one hand, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G has the best charge up efficiency (82.2% vs. 81.3% for the OnePlus 9 and 74.5% for the Xiaomi Mi 11). On the other hand, across our entire database, the Oppo device is one of the very highest for residual power consumption when the phone is plugged and fully charged (trickle charge).
Discharge
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (121)
A very well-designed device, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G shows particularly optimized power consumption when streaming video and playing videos, as well as when gaming. Its only weak point in discharge efficiency is its power consumption during the night.
Conclusion
One of its only drawbacks is its lack of wireless charging, which many other smartphones in this segment offer. Overall, though, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G is a well-balanced device, with excellent power optimization as well as excellent charging time.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.