The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G arrived on the market in June 2021. Let’s take a look at how well it did in our comprehensive Display protocol testing.
Key display specifications:
- 6.5-inch OLED display
- 160 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches)
- Resolution: 1080 x 2440 (402 ppi)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G chipset
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”)
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G
123
display
123
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Best: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (160)
136
Vivo X90 Pro+
Best: Vivo X90 Pro+ (164)
101
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
Best: Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon) (162)
136
Huawei P40 Pro
Best: Huawei P40 Pro (155)
128
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Best: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (168)
127
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Best: Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (161)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
88
th
1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
4. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
7. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
7. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
9. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
12. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
15. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
30. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
34. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
38. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
38. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
38. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
44. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
44. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
48. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
55. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
62. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
62. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
65. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
72. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
72. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
88. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
88. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
92. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
98. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
102. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
105. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
109. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
114. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
114. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
118. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
124. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
126. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
127. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
134. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
136. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
137. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
145. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
146. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
148. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
Position in Premium Ranking
18
th
1. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
5. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
5. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
7. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
12. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
12. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
18. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
40. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
Pros
- The device has decent colors in every lighting condition.
- No frame mismatches are visible when playing video games.
- The device is smooth when browsing the web and scrolling in the gallery.
Cons
- Despite image enhancement under direct sunlight, the device lacks brightness in outdoor conditions to be truly readable.
- Watching HDR10 content is not comfortable, as the device slightly lacks brightness and shows no details in dark tones.
- A delay is noticeable after jumping forward or backward in videos.
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G brings with it several issues, notably a lack of brightness that detracts from the comfort of viewing photos and watching HD10 videos on it.
Brightness vs Contrast comparison (0 Lux)
Brightness vs Contrast comparison (30 000 Lux)
In low-light environments, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G is slightly glaring. Under sunlight, the device lacks enough brightness to be truly enjoyable.
Readability outdoors in shade, from left to right: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, Oppo Reno5 Pro+, Xiaomi Mi 11, Asus Zenfone 8
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
When viewed on angle, the device loses significant brightness and contrast and is barely readable.
The screen has reasonably uniform brightness but has a slightly brighter area at the bottom and a slightly darker area on the right side.
Images on the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G take on a pink cast in both indoor and outdoor conditions. Under sunlight, the device shows a slight orange cast and its colors are often too saturated, as illustrated below.
Color rendering under sunlight, clockwise from top left: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, Oppo Reno5 Pro+, Xiaomi Mi 11, Asus Zenfone 8
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
In the left-hand chart below you can see that the Oppo device lacks accuracy in orange and blue tones. The center of each circle is the target color; the further the tip of the arrow is outside of the circle, the more users will notice the difference between the color on the display and the original color of the source material.
The scatter chart on the right shows that the Reno6 Pro 5G’s white point, which is already quite pink, shifts even further into pink and then into blue when holding it at different angles.
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, color fidelity at 0 lux in the P3 color space
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, scatter graph of white point on angle
The photos below illustrate the measured results:
Color when held on axis (top) and when held at a 45° angle (bottom), from left to right: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, Oppo Reno5 Pro+, Xiaomi Mi 11, Asus Zenfone 8
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
The Reno6 Pro 5G’s brightness is slightly low and dark tones in HDR10 content show no detail, although the brightness level can be modified manually. Colors are saturated and a slight blue-pink cast is visible, and skin tones appear redder than they should be.
Video color, clockwise from top left: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, Oppo Reno5 Pro+, Xiaomi Mi 11, Asus Zenfone 8
(Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only)
Although the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G shows some frame mismatches in videos at 30 and 60 fps in our lab tests (as shown below), no frame mismatches were visible when playing video games. The device shows no frame duplications and handles motion blur quite well. There is a noticeable delay in playback after jumping forward or backward in videos.
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, frame drops at 30 fps
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, frame drops at 60 fps
While the Reno6 Pro 5G is accurate when zooming in the gallery app, it does not always detect touches on corners and edges. It is smooth when browsing the web and when scrolling in the gallery, but lacks smoothness when gaming. Further, the Oppo device reacts to some ghost touches, mainly when in landscape mode. It manages judder well, but some aliasing is visible when playing video games.
English
Camera
Audio
Battery
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.