We put the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in various tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.5 inches, AMOLED
- Dimensions: 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm
- Resolution: 2400 x 1080 pixels
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
display
136
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
131
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
73
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
93
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
156
th
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
158
9. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
11. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
11. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
18. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
20. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
25. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
25. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
39. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
42. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
44. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
50. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
50. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
55. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
61. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
67. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
78. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
78. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
83. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
86. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
86. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
86. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
91. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
96. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
96. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
100. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
100. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
100. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
111. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
115. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
119. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
136. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
140. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
140. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
144. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
150. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
152. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
155. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
156. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
160. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
163. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in High-End Ranking
30
th
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
17. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
23. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
26. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
30. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
Pros
- Accurate colors, especially in outdoor conditions
- Smooth web browsing
- Brightness and color uniformity throughout the screen
Cons
- Lack of brightness in most tested conditions, except for low light, where screen is too bright
- Unable to read HDR10 content
- Improperly handled frame drops when watching videos or gaming
- Inability to read 60 fps UHD content
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s overall display score of 77 places the phone in the lower half of our entire database. The Galaxy A53 5G display is well adapted to basic usage, providing good readability and color reproduction in average lighting conditions. The display offered a smooth experience when web browsing, the most simple of use cases.
But when it comes to using more demanding applications, such as video games or HDR videos, the advanced screen features that Samsung is known for are just not there to provide a satisfying experience. The inability of the device to support HDR10 videos, a common format, is a major drawback to watching videos on this screen. When it comes to gaming, very frequent frame drops, aliasing, as well as responses to incorrectly perceived screen touches, are likely to disappoint heavy gamers.
When compared with the other phones in our High-end segment, the Galaxy A53 5G finds itself near the bottom, and just behind its predecessors the A52 5G and A52s 5G. At the time of this writing, the A53 5G also ranked last among all of the Samsung displays we have tested so far.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
Readability
136
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions
Readability in a sunlight (>90 0000 lux) environment
From left: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, Realme GT Neo 2, Xiaomi 11T
(Photos for illustration only)
Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.
Color
131
Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8
How Display Color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux
Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, Realme GT Neo 2, Xiaomi 11T
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
Video
73
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
How Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)
Brightness in a low-light (0 lux) environment, SDR
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, Realme GT Neo 2, Xiaomi 11T
Inability to read HDR video
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, Realme GT Neo 2, Xiaomi 11T
(Photos for illustration only)
Gamut coverage for video content
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
How Display Motion score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.
Video frame drops
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).
Touch
93
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
How Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.
Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.
How Display Artifacts score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.
Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
PWM Frequency Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
240 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users.
Aliasing (closeup)
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
(Photos for illustration only)
English
中文
Camera
Audio
Battery
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.