Pentax 645Z: A great choice for medium-format shooters

DxOMark Sensor
Pentax 645Z

Announced in April 2014 as the replacement to the 40-million-pixel Pentax 645D, the Pentax 645Z is a medium-format DSLR with a Sony sensor that measures 43.8 x 32.8mm. With 51.4 million effective pixels, the CMOS chip produces 8256 x 6192-pixel images that make 27.5 x 20.6-inch (69.9 x 52.4cm) prints at 300 ppi.

There’s no optical low-pass filter over the sensor, but there’s a Color Moire Correction option for JPEGs in the menu.

Unlike some medium-format cameras, the Pentax 645Z’s sensor is integrated into the camera so it can’t be changed or upgraded with a different back. However, the camera has the look and feel of an overgrown 35mm or small-format DSLR, with weatherproofing and dust-proofing that makes it more at home in the field than some other medium-format models.

At this time of writing, the 645Z’s pixel count is beaten only by such digital backs as the Phase One IQ3 (which is available with 50, 80 or 100Mp) and the Hasselblad H6D-100c.

Key Specifications:

  • 51.4Mp medium format (43.8×32.8mm) CMOS sensor
  • No optical low-pass filter
  • ISO 100-204, 800
  • PRIME III image processing engine
  • JPEG, RAW (PEF or DNG), and TIFF file formats
  • Pentax 645AF2 lens mount

Overall image sensor performance

Pentax 645Z Sensor Scores
With an overall DxOMark sensor score of 101 points, the Pentax 645Z has the second-highest-scoring sensor we’ve ever tested, beaten only by the 51.4Mp Sony sensor in the Hasselblad X1D-50c.

As you would expect with such a high overall score, the 645Z’s sub-scores are extremely good, indicating that it’s capable of capturing a huge range of colors and tones in a single file, while noise is controlled well. A Portrait (Color Depth) score of 26 bits and a Landscape (Dynamic Range) score of 14.7Ev are both very good, and that means that there’s plenty of data available for post-capture adjustments, so neither posterization nor banding should be an issue with “normal” levels of image editing.

One of the advantages of a medium-format sensor is that the photoreceptors (aka pixels) can be made larger than they in a smaller device with the same pixel count. This extra light enables the sensor to produce a stronger signal that requires less applied gain, so images should be cleaner. This is borne out by the 645Z’s high Sports (Low-Light ISO) score of ISO 4505 — the highest value we have recorded to date.

Image quality compared

In this section, we’re going to compare the Pentax 645Z with the Hasselblad X1D-50c and the Nikon D850, our three top-scoring cameras to date. As it has a very similar Sony sensor, the Hasselblad X1D-50c is a natural competitor to the Pentax 645Z. And while the Nikon D850 has a smaller sensor, it has proven very popular thanks to its two-in-one camera that combines high resolution with an impressive autofocus system.

Pentax 645Z score comparison

Click here to open our interactive DxOMark comparison tool

Interestingly, it’s the Nikon D850 that has the advantage for Portrait (Color Depth), along with a very high Landscape (Dynamic Range) score, but it lags behind the Pentax 645Z for Sports (Low-Light ISO) by around 0.8EV, indicating that noise is more of an issue for the full-frame Nikon camera when light levels fall.

The Pentax 645Z and Hasselblad X1D-50c compete very closely, but the X1D comes out on top, thanks to its slightly better Portrait (Color Depth) score.

In-depth comparisons

Now we’ll take a closer look at how the Pentax 645Z compares with the Hasselblad X1D-50c and the Nikon D850 throughout the RAW file sensitivity (ISO) range.

Portrait (Color Depth)

Pentax 645Z Color Sensitivity

This graph illustrates where the Nikon D850 wins for Color Sensitivity — that is, at the lowest ISO setting. Once you push the sensitivity (ISO) above that value, it actually drops very slightly behind the two medium-format cameras. Nevertheless, if you want the highest possible Color Sensitivity, the D850 is the one to go for among these three cameras. Of the two medium-format cameras, the Hasselblad X1D-50c is very slightly better at the lowest setting.

Looking in-depth at the color response reveals that although the Pentax 645Z’s sensor is very good (and very similar to the Hasselblad X1D’s), it can’t match the D850’s sensor for reproducing red and green. This is unlikely to be visible to the human eye, but the 645Z’s files could prove a little more limited when they are edited.

Landscape (Dynamic Range)

Pentax 645Z Dynamic Range

All three cameras have a dynamic range of more than 14EV at their lowest sensitivity setting, which makes them ideal for shooting high-contrast scenes such as landscapes and weddings, where subtle tonal variations are very important. Further good news is that none of the three cameras drops below our 10EV cutoff for good image quality until their sensitivity setting is pushed over ISO 3200. This could be useful for low-light photography, but in reality, most medium-format photographers are likely to keep sensitivity as low as possible and use either long exposures or flash to maintain their camera’s advantage.

At most of the higher sensitivity values, the Pentax 645Z has an advantage of about 0.5EV over the Nikon D850, which is explained by the 645Z’s bigger sensor. However, given the significance of the size difference, we might have expected the medium format camera to do even better, which is indicative of how far sensor development has come in the three years or so since the 645Z was announced.

Sports (Low-Light ISO)

Pentax 645Z SNR

Again, the two medium-format cameras’ sensors beat the small-format sensor, but for much of the sensitivity range, the D850 is less than 1EV behind, which again underscores the development in sensor technology since the Pentax and Hasselblad cameras were introduced.

It’s also worth remembering that photographers don’t tend to buy medium-format cameras for their low-light capability, but rather for achieving the highest possible image quality. With this in mind, the Pentax 645Z should be used at ISO 800 or lower, but it drops below our 30dB cutoff only when it’s pushed above ISO 3200. Even then, we wouldn’t classify the image quality as bad until around ISO 51,200, which opens up the scope for shooting in low light.


It’s clear from our testing that the Pentax 645Z’s sensor is extremely capable, coming within a whisper of matching the performance of the Hasselblad X1D sensor (our highest-scoring sensor to date). The 645Z’s high dynamic range and color sensitivity make it ideally suited for capturing the types of scenes that are traditionally favored by medium-format photographers — landscapes, weddings, portraits, and still lifes (commercial). Medium-format shooters are usually interested in capturing images with lots of detail, low noise, and smooth tonal gradations.

In addition, the Pentax 645Z controls noise well, making it suitable for use in relatively low light, and perhaps expanding the range of conditions in which medium-format cameras are traditionally used.

It’s interesting to compare the Pentax 645Z sensor against the Nikon D850’s because although the former is about 1.7x larger, it’s also around three years older. While the 645Z beats the Nikon sensor in our tests, the Nikon comes closer than you might expect, given the size difference. If Sony made a medium-format sensor with the same design as the D850, it would beat the sensors in both the Pentax 645Z and the Hassleblad X1D-50c.

In this review we have compared the Pentax 645Z sensor to its most direct rivals from other brands. As usual, you can create your own comparison and in-depth analysis using our interactive image sensor comparison tool.

  • kisley

    DxO – thanks for this strong review of an excellent camera. I shoot Pentax APS-C (K-3, K-S2) and mirrorless (K-01, Q), and can attest to the quality of the brand overall. I do wish that the full review had been published in 2015, when the sensor was originally rated, but I’m glad to see it finally getting the attention it deserves. Thanks again!

  • TinusVerdino

    Wow that one was a long time coming. Now for the K-70 and the KP……

  • Ronnie MacLellan

    Why hold up publication of this information for over two years until after the release of the 102 scoring Hasselblad?

  • zentrum

    What an incredible coincidence that this score was released two years later, just a few days after it was surpassed.

    • L.A. Canuck

      It shows that Hassy and Nikon were able to purchase their results (or suppress testing on the 645z for a while)

  • harvey

    Time to test the Fuji GFX as it seems to do some interesting things as you ramp up the ISO. I think it will test better than any of these three.

  • KJ Burke

    Please add the K-1 and FA lenses to your database.

    • Michael MacGillivray

      I 2nd the motion.

  • Shaurya

    Publishing results 2 years after testing the camera, soon after it was surpassed by competing camera, and without offering any explanation for such a long delay, makes DXO look even shadier than before.

  • Peter

    seems to be paid by Hasselblad … Tzzzz everybody already knows that the Pentax 645Z is an outstanding camera

  • Sokol Hazizi

    i used to believe DXO MARK was one of the most reliable, unbiased sites to get info on cameras and lenses, but now this! I hope they have some credible reason for this, otherwise it looks ugly.

    • flodxomark

      Hello. Please read this article on PetaPixel, Regards,

      • CreeDo Lala

        Hi… this still doesn’t make sense… if the review is 100% complete, why not post it in 2015 and simply put a disclaimer that it’s the last medium format review (for a while)? Why put time and work into a review, then hold it back from people who want to make an educated comparison?

  • cyperalien

    How do you know that Sony made the D850 sensor?

    • Gov

      They didn’t. It is an Israeli company owned for 49% by Panasonic (at least that is my information).

  • Ivanov Vano

    645Z is really 3 year and 7 months old. Why do you publish information close to the end of 2017??? And what is your method of comparison? Why 101, not 102? :)))

  • Mike Jackson

    That sucks for Pentax… they would have been #1 by a long way, for 3+ years. And let’s be honest, this site sells cameras (and phones) for manufacturers.

  • would love to see how much Nikon paid for DxO not to publish this cameras specs until they could design something that could compete with it.

    Sad part is that this camera DID go up back when it came out and they took it down very soon after. HMMMMMMMMM

    Guess Pentax needs to throw money at DxO so they will actually review some of their cameras.

  • Sylvain BARTHOLOME

    I have been using this camera since long before you refused to publish the results, and I now discover that there is a sensor-shifting Shake Reduction system on the camera ? I didn’t know… Would you be so kind as to explain how to activate it ?

  • rich w

    Sigma Quattro H ought to be on the list of comparison as well.

  • Sandy Hancock

    Sensor shift AA filter simulator? Since when? What else have you just made up?

    Basically, you’re finally admitting that it has been the best medium format camera on the market for three years, but you only post a review now one of your pet brands has finally caught up.

  • Cor euzoekjijwerk


    why not test Fujifilm cameras in you?
    or did I miss something?



We are hiring!