The Apple iPhone 15 Plus and Apple iPhone 15 share the same rear camera specs, as well the same chipset, so as expected, the results of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus camera are exactly the same as those of the Apple iPhone 15.
We’ve included an example from our testing to show the similarities between these two models. But for a more in-depth look at the Apple iPhone 15 Plus’s rear camera photo and video performance, we direct you to the full test results of the Apple iPhone 15.
Overview
Key camera specifications:
- Primary:48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ field of view
- A16 Bionic Chipset
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
145
camera
122
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (123)
122
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (125)
100
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
Best: Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ (123)
113
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
97
Honor Magic5 Pro
Best: Honor Magic5 Pro (116)
75
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
80
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (85)
84
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (91)
84
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Best: Oppo Find X7 Ultra (118)
90
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (121)
115
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
117
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (119)
117
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
Best: Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ (119)
107
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
117
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Best: Oppo Find X7 Ultra (119)
84
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
117
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (118)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Position in Global Ranking
18
th
5. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
14. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
16. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
20. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
25. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
140
31. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
35. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
35. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
40. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
133
40. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
133
48. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
60. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
60. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
60. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
65. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
69. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
73. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
76. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
82. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
82. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
82. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
89. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
89. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
89. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
95. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
98. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
98. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
107. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
110. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
112. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
112. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
112. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
117. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
117. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
122. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
125. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
126. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
127. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
129. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
131. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
138. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
138. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
141. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
143. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
143. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
145. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
146. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
148. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
150. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
151. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
153. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
156. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
158. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
160. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
161. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
164. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
164. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
166. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
167. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
169. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
173. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
175. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
181. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
183. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
17
th
5. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
13. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
15. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
18. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
140
27. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
31. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
31. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
36. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
133
40. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
49. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
54. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
56. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
58. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
61. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
66. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
68. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
68. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
73. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
74. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
74. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Vivid brightness and contrast when photos and videos are viewed on HDR display
- Pleasant and natural color rendering and skin tones especially in bright light, for photos and videos
- Accurate depth estimation and efficient fine details segmentation in portrait mode
- Low level of noise on videos
- Effective video stabilization
- Smooth zooming experience on preview
Cons
- High level of photo noise, particularly in dark areas
- Fairly limited zooming capabilities
- Slightly limited dynamic range in photos and video
- Fine details are sometimes lost in low-light videos
- Artifacts, including flare, moving texture (low light), and aliasing
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.