Google Pixel: Retested with the new DxOMark Mobile protocol

90
DxOMark Mobile

When the Google Pixel was launched in 2016, it was one of the top smartphone cameras we tested with the original DxOMark Mobile protocol in October 2016, thanks to its mixture of powerful hardware and innovative algorithms.

The Pixel was also the first Google smartphone to drop the Nexus moniker of previous models and use the same Pixel branding as the company’s  top-end Chromebooks and tablets. With a 1/2.3-inch 12MP sensor and f/2.0 aperture (but no optical image stabilization), the Pixel camera hardware specifications look identical to its predecessor, the Nexus 6P. However, Google has put a lot of effort into the software side of things, and thanks to more powerful processing and zero shutter lag, the company’s HDR+ mode, which uses multi-frame processing to reduce noise, capture better detail, and increase dynamic range, is now on by default. In addition, there is a new gyroscope-based video stabilization system for smoother panning and shake-free handheld video recording. Read on to find out how the Pixel performs under the updated DxOMark Mobile testing protocol.

Please note that for this article we retested the Google Pixel with our updated DxOMark Mobile test protocol that includes tests for zoom and bokeh quality, among other improvements. You can still find our more comprehensive original Google Pixel review from September 2016 here

Key specifications:

  • 1/2.3” 12MP CMOS sensor with 1.55µm pixels
  • f/2.0 aperture
  • AF with on-sensor phase detection and laser assistance
  • Dual-tone LED flash
  • 4K video at 30 fps
  • Gyroscope-based video stabilization
  • 8MP front camera, 1/3.2″ sensor, 1.4 µm pixels, f/2.4, 1080p video

Test summary: Still one of the best

Almost a year after its launch, the Google Pixel remains one of the best smartphones for photography around. When tested with the new DxOMark Mobile protocol, it achieves the highest current score for dynamic range and is also still one of the best in terms of detail, color, and noise in all light conditions. However, the new testing methods have also revealed some artifact-related issues: the Pixel loses points for very strong flare, and maze and moiré artifacts are now also more visible in our more challenging updated test scenes.

Given that the Pixel is a single-lens device, it is not a surprise that its poor digital zoom quality cannot compete with dual-cam equipped models such as the iPhone 7 Plus. And while the Pixel comes with an interesting bokeh feature that allows you to blur the background in portrait images by moving the phone slightly upwards during capture, the image results show strong artifacts — for example, uneven blur around the hair of portrait subjects.

When shooting video, the Pixel is capable of capturing decent exposures down to very low light levels, but dynamic range is still limited. The latter is true for most of the Pixel’s competitors as well, though. Texture is good when compared to the competition and video stabilization works efficiently, but can create some artifacts when shooting indoors, such as noticeable differences in sharpness between frames.

90
DxOMark mobile
Google Pixel
90
DxOMark Mobile
photo
91
DxOMark Mobile
video

Pros

  • Very good highlight preservation
  • Very good detail in low light
  • Good noise levels in bright and medium light
  • Very fast, repeatable, and accurate autofocus
  • Well-balanced and well-exposed flash pictures

 Pros

  • Good exposure in almost all light conditions
  • Very good stabilization in most situations
  • Fast, smooth, and stable video autofocus
  • Good autofocus tracking
  • Good noise reduction and color at all light levels
  • Fast and smooth exposure transition

Cons

  • Strong flare
  • Very low levels of detail for medium- and long-range zoom
  • Strong depth estimation artifacts in bokeh mode
  • Strong artifacts on moving subjects in bokeh mode
  • Strong moiré
  • Luminance noise in low light

Cons

  • Lack of dynamic range
  • Visible color shading in indoor conditions
  • Occasionally abrupt white balance transitions
  • Slight white balance inaccuracies in low light
  • Stabilization artifacts in indoor conditions (sharpness differences over consecutive frames)
  • Slightly too much noise indoors
  • Judder effect when panning
  • Yo Homie

    Seems like everything they rated is fairly. Every point i would agree with, which is reassuring. Its holding its own, but hopefully these new ratings will allow manufacturers to focus on what they need to improve, or what they want out of their camera.

  • Marcel Mayer

    pixel dont have manual mode. so shitty test here

    • fabio Scheer

      The test is not shitty as they test all phones in their respective auto mode. Even if it had a manual mode it would not matter in this test.
      I myself use a Google Pixel XL and the camera lives up to the scores achieved here.

      • Marcel Mayer

        sure… then make photos with your great Pixel in manuel mode

        • fabio Scheer

          Have i said that i need a manual mode? If i want to take my photos with manual aperture/shutter speed/exposure i’ll either use Open Camera, which does at least some of the things mentioned or i’ll just use a DSLR/Bridge Type camera.

  • GCHQ

    Pictures?

  • GCHQ

    Tragic

  • Ygor Cortes

    Where are the actual pictures?

  • LynX

    Shooting video on Pixel XL in low light conditions are very bad. I agree with rest of the ratings.