Smartphones  >  Oppo Find X5 Lite  >  Display Test Results
High-End ?

Oppo Find X5 Lite Display test

This device has been retested in the latest version of our protocol. Overall, sub-scores and attributes are up to date. For detailed information, check the What’s New article
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

We put the Oppo Find X5 Lite through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance, and here’s how it did.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.43 inches AMOLED, (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.81 mm
  • Resolution: 2400 x 1080 pixels, (~409 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz (maximum)

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
display
99

163

133

164

100

162

119

159

127

170

110

163

Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.

Pros

  • Accurate touch
  • Readable in low light with a brightness adaptation according to the time of the day
  • Good color and brightness uniformity

Cons

  • Very saturated colors in HDR10 videos, showing a green cast, with hardly visible dark tones
  • Lack of brightness, which affects level of details when viewing pictures in indoor and outdoor conditions
  • Visible blue and pink stripes when viewed in angle

The Oppo Find X5 Lite’s web browsing lacked smoothness, which was a distraction when using the screen in its most basic function.
The display’s brightness levels are programmed to be adapted to the time of day. While brightness was well suited in low light during the day, we found it to be a bit dim during the night. However, light transitions were correct. The BLF also gave the screen a noticeable orange cast.
In outdoor and indoor conditions, the device lacked enough brightness for comfortable reading. In addition, pink and blue stripes were visible on the screen when viewing at an angle.
For gamers, the display offered an average experience, with just a few visible frame drops when playing and accurate touch, which offset the aliasing and lack of smoothness when playing.
Watching HDR10 videos on the Oppo Find X5 Lite was a poor experience because of the screen’s green cast and very saturated colors. In addition,  the low brightness and the low level of details in the dark tones affected the HDR experience

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

99

Oppo Find X5 Lite

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read the display under different real-life conditions on still content (photos & web). DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests,perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions
Indoor at 1000 lux, from left to right: Oppo Find X5 Lite, Oppo Find X3 Lite, Xiaomi 11T, Google Pixel 6
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity in false color for 20% gray

This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color is, the more uniform is the display. 

Color

133

Oppo Find X5 Lite

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

White point color temperature under indoor lighting conditions (1000 lux)

Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the greater the color difference is visible. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will only be visible to trained eyes.

 

Oppo Find X5 Lite, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Oppo Find X5 Lite, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space

This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

White point on angle, Oppo Find X5 Lite
White point on angle, Oppo Find X5 Lite

Video

100

Oppo Find X5 Lite

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)

The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR.  The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the mastering color space of each video.

Oppo Find X5 Lite, HDR10
Oppo Find X5 Lite, SDR
Clockwise from top left: Oppo Find X5 Lite, Oppo Find X3 Lite, Google Pixel 6, and Xiaomi 11T
(Photos for illustration only)

Motion

119

Oppo Find X5 Lite

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Video Frame Drops

Oppo Find X5 at 30fps
Oppo Find X5 at 60fps
This long exposure photo presents the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

127

Oppo Find X5 Lite

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Average Touch Response Time Oppo Find X5 Lite
104 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.

This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between the robot touching the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

110

Oppo Find X5 Lite

163

OnePlus Open

How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker as well as evaluates the residual aliasing when playing videogames, among others.

Average Reflectance (SCI) Oppo Find X5 Lite
4.9 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.

Measurements above that show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection

PWM Frequency Oppo Find X5 Lite
360 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users.

This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.

 

 

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.