We put the Realme GT 2 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.7 inches AMOLED LTPO
- Dimensions: 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.18 mm
- Resolution: 3216 x 1440 pixels, (~525 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20.1:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Realme GT 2 Pro
130
display
133
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (160)
159
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Best: Sony Xperia 5 IV (163)
92
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
Best: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) (162)
140
Huawei P40 Pro
Best: Huawei P40 Pro (155)
156
OnePlus 9
Best: OnePlus 9 (165)
112
LG Wing
Best: LG Wing (149)
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
27
th
1. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
11. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
13. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
15. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
15. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
15. Vivo X80 Pro (Mediatek)
134
18. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
18. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
18. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
18. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
23. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
23. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
27. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
32. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
32. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
38. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
40. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
46. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
46. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
61. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
61. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
65. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
78. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
83. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
87. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
92. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
95. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
101. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
103. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
104. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
112. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
113. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
115. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
Position in Premium Ranking
5
th
3. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
3. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
5. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
9. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
9. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
15. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
36. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
Pros
- Good color fidelity
- Accurate touch throughout the entire screen surface, including corners and edges
- Smoothness and fluid touch when browsing or playing video games
Cons
- Poor video experience due to a lack of brightness, oversaturated colors, and hardly visible dark tones
- Visible aliasing when playing video games
- Lack of brightness under sunlight
The Realme GT 2 Pro display’s strongest point is how faithfully it reproduces color, where it achieved a top score. The colors on the display match what the user sees in real life, which makes taking and viewing photos, for example, quite satisfying. The display also demonstrated good uniformity of color and brightness. The screen was readable in most environments, whether indoors or outdoors, but it noticeably lacked brightness when under sunlight.
The lack of brightness, however, had an effect on the video-watching experience, where the colors also tended to appear oversaturated and the dark tones of the video were hardly visible, making it less suited for those users who like to watch movies on their smartphones.
But for mobile gamers, the Realme GT 2 Pro’s accurate and smooth touch makes the device very well suited for playing video games.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
Readability
133
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.
Brightness under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions
Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left: Realme GT 2 Pro, Realme GT Neo 2, Google Pixel 6
Readability in a sunlight (>90 0000 lux) environment
From left: Realme GT 2 Pro, Realme GT Neo 2, Google Pixel 6
Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.
Color
159
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Sony Xperia 5 IV
How Display Color score is composed
The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux
Color rendering in sunlight (>90 0000 lux)
From left: Realme GT 2 Pro, Realme GT Neo 2, Google Pixel 6
Color fidelity measurements
DeviceUnderTest, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
DeviceUnderTest, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
Color shift on angle
From left: Realme GT 2 Pro, Realme GT Neo 2, Google Pixel 6
Video
92
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
How Display Video score is composed
Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.
Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top: Realme GT 2 Pro, Realme GT Neo 2, Google Pixel 6
Gamut coverage for video content
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
Motion
140
Huawei P40 Pro
Huawei P40 Pro
How Display Motion score is composed
The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.
Video frame drops at 30 fps
Video frame drops at 60 fps
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).
How Display Touch score is composed
To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.
Average Touch Response Time Realme GT 2 Pro
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.
How Display Artifacts score is composed
Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.
Average Reflectance (SCI) Realme GT 2 Pro
Reflectance measurement (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Realme GT 2 Pro
360 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Flicker comparison
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
English
中文
Camera
Audio
Battery
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.