We’ve already tested the camera of the Exynos-powered international version of the Samsung flagship Galaxy S22 Ultra. In this review, we take a close look at the version that is marketed primarily in North America and China and uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset.
Camera specs between the two versions are identical, offering a primary module with 108MP sensor, a 12MP ultra-wide camera and two dedicated tele cameras. Medium-range tele range is covered by a 3x lens with 10MP resolution. For longer distances a 10x periscope-style module is on board.
In video mode, the S22 Ultra is capable of recording 8K footage at 24 frames per second or 4K resolution files at up to 60 fps. With such an impressive spec sheet the S22 Ultra competes with heavy weights such as the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, Huawei P50 Pro or Xiaomi 12 Pro. Let’s see how it did in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 108 MP 1/1.33″ sensor, 0.8μm pixels, 24mm-equivalent, f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS, PDAF, Laser-AF
- Ultra-wide: 12MP 1/2.55″ sensor, 1.4μm pixels, 13mm-equivalent, f/2.2-aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF
- Tele 1: 10MP 1/3.52″ sensor, 1.12μm pixels, 230mm-equivalent, f/4.9-aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF, 10x optical zoom
- Tele 2: 10MP 1/3.52″ sensor, 1.12μm pixels, 70mm equivalent, f/2.4-aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF, 3x optical zoom
- 8K up to 24fps, 4K up to 60fps, 1080p at 60fps (tested at 4K/30fps)
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
camera
103
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
117
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (128)
105
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
109
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
86
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
68
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
70
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
71
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (91)
102
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
98
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
91
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
101
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (119)
110
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
102
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
106
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Best: Oppo Find X7 Ultra (119)
73
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
109
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (118)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
44
th
7. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
18. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
20. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
20. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
27. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
27. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
31. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
37. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
44. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
44. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
59. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
59. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
72. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
72. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
77. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
81. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
81. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
89. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
95. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
95. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
102. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
108. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
111. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
111. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
121. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
121. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
125. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
127. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
127. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
127. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
132. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
132. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
137. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
140. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
141. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
142. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
144. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
146. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
153. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
153. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
157. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
159. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
159. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
162. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
162. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
162. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
165. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
167. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
169. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
170. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
172. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
175. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
177. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
179. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
180. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
183. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
183. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
185. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
186. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
188. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
192. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
194. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
201. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
203. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
37
th
7. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
16. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
18. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
18. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
22. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
24. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
28. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
42. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
48. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
57. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
62. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
62. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
65. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
67. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
75. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
77. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
83. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
84. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
84. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Accurate white balance and good detail
- Good exposure and wide dynamic range
- Nice color and good exposure in flash-off night shots
- Accurate subject isolation and blur gradient in bokeh mode
- Accurate exposure and wide dynamic range in bright light and indoor video
- Nice color and skin tones in video
- Accurate face tracking in video
- Effective video stabilization when walking while recording
Cons
- Luminance noise in photo and video
- Slow autofocus
- Image artifacts, including ringing, fringing and fusion artifacts
- Strong texture instabilities in tele shots
- Strong ringing and loss of fine detail in video
- White balance casts in bright light and indoor videos
With a DXOMARK Camera score of 131 the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) achieves the same result as the Exynos-powered international model. Overall, the camera delivers a solid performance and some improvements over its predecessor the S21 Ultra, especially for zoom and video, but it isn’t up there with the very best in the Ultra-Premium segment. This is particularly true for night photography and in terms of texture/noise trade-off.
This outdoor image shows good exposure on the subject and a wide dynamic range. The white balance is neutral and the level of detail is high.
When taking still images, the camera does overall well and shines, especially in the color category, thanks to accurate and pleasant color rendering. Compared to the Exynos variant, luminance noise is less intrusive but still noticeable. Texture is slightly better as well. Our testers observed ringing artifacts in all conditions and fusion artifacts can appear in high-contrast scenes. Ghosting is better controlled than on the Exynos device, though.
Target exposure is usually good in all conditions and in this indoor scene, we can see that the Snapdragon device produces slightly better detail and lower noise levels than the Exynos version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), indoor scene
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), crop: good texture and fairly low noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), indoor scene
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: slight loss of detail, fine luminance noise
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, indoor scene
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, crop: slight loss of detail, fine luminance noise
Pictures recorded on the ultra-wide camera show good detail at the center of the frame, but detail gets noticeably softer towards the edges. Color rendering tends to be neutral, but noise is noticeable, even in bright outdoor light.
Crop: good detail at the center of the frame but drop-off towards the edges
When shooting at tele settings, the S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) suffers from resolution instabilities, especially at close-range settings when light gets dimmer. In comparison, the Exynos model and iPhone 13 Pro Max deliver a more consistent resolution across light levels and zoom factors.
In video mode, the Snapdragon phone’s performance is close to the Exynos device, particularly the good exposure and wide dynamic range in bright light and indoors, as well as the good autofocus system. This said, oversharpening results in strong ringing on high-contrast edges. This has a negative impact on detail rendering and is especially noticeable when videos are viewed on a large display. Our testers also observed higher noise levels in low light, especially in lab conditions.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), video still, 1000 lux
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon), crop: loss of fine detail, ringing, moiré
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), video still, 1000 lux
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: similar detail, less ringing
_________________________________________
Correction:
Because of a bug in the measurement of image detail preservation, the Zoom score of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) has been updated to 85 from 82, and the Tele score to 109 from 105. These changes had no visible effect on the overall score.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.