We put the Honor Magic6 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across four criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.8 inches OLED
- Dimensions 162.5 mm x 75.8 mm x 8.9 mm
- Resolution: 1280 x 2800 pixels, (~453 ppi density)
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Honor Magic6 Pro
157
display
162
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
147
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
159
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Best: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (165)
162
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Position in Global Ranking
3
rd
5. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
6. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
6. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
12. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
13. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
18. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
18. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
28. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
31. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
33. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
39. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
39. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
43. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
49. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
54. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
65. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
70. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
73. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
73. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
73. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
73. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
78. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
83. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
83. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
87. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
87. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
87. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
98. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
102. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
106. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
123. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
127. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
127. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
131. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
137. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
139. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
142. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
143. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
149. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
3
rd
4. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
5. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
9. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
10. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
14. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
14. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
18. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
24. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
28. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
30. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
32. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
32. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
38. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
45. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
47. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
49. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
56. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
56. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
60. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
60. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
68. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
81. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
83. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- Well-suited brightness levels for different lighting conditions
- Very few frame mismatches in all content
- Accurate, reactive, and smooth touch panel
- Good HDR video experience in low-light conditions
Cons
- Immediate color shift when viewing at an angle
- Perceivable striped pattern on a dark uniform background when in dark-room conditions
The Honor Magic6 Pro Display put in a top-scoring performance, with an all-around excellent user experience in all our use cases, particularly in gaming.
The Magic6 Pro’s readability was overall excellent in all lighting environments, with a steady and reliable performance. While the maximum brightness did not reach the same levels attained by some of the Magic6 Pro’s competitors, the screen was consistently and comfortably readable in all conditions – not too bright in low-light or dark conditions and not too dark when outdoors to affect the user experience.
Additionally, the outdoor brightness level remained consistent for all types of displayed content, which is not the case for most competitors’ devices, whose display luminance decreases as white areas on the screen increase. Although the device appeared uniform in our test, a faint striped pattern was visible on the screen when room or background conditions turned dark. However, this striped pattern was not visible in other lighting conditions.
The device was flicker-free, showing reduced temporal light artifacts thanks to high pulse width modulation (PWM).
The screen’s colors were slightly above average, remaining generally accurate and quite stable outdoors, but our testers did note some immediate color shifts when holding the device at an angle. Although most screens shift colors at wide angles, the Magic6 Pro’s colors were shifting at relatively lower angles when compared with the competition.
The HDR video-watching experience was quite satisfying and comfortable, with very good brightness and contrast in low light. Under indoor lighting conditions, however, peak brightness was too high, and dark tones lacked some details, but rending remained comfortable. In SDR, the device adapted brightness and contrast in all tested conditions.
The device’s display showed significant improvements over its predecessor the Honor Magic5 Pro in all subscores. The Magic6 Pro’s exceptional management of frame mismatches and motion blur, provides the user with an excellent experience watching high-quality videos or playing video games.
In touch, the Honor Magic6 Pro came very close to the top score, but the screen lacked some smoothness when viewing the gallery. However, users who like to play video games on their phones should take note of the Honor Magic6 Pro’s impressive touch response time at 53 ms, which shows a marked improvement from the Magic5 Pro’s 70 ms, and even surpasses the Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24+’s measured 65 ms. (For those keeping track, the fastest touch response time we have tested so far was on the Lenovo Legion Y90, which clocked in at 41 ms!) An added plus: The Honor Magic6 Pro had no unintended touches on the screen.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis, a device undergoes a series of objective and perceptual tests in controlled lab and real-life conditions. The DXOMARK Display score takes into account the overall user experience the screen provides, considering the hardware capacity and the software tuning. In testing, only factory-installed video and photo apps are used. More in-depth details about how DXOMARK tests displays are available in the article “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section focuses on the key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Full reports with detailed performance evaluations are available upon request. To order a copy, please contact us.
Readability
162
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates the user’s ease and comfort of viewing still content, such as photos or a web page, on the display under different lighting conditions. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing and analysis.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen luminance in environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Contrast under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen’s contrast levels in lighting environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Luminance vs Viewing Angle
This graph presents how the luminance drops as viewing angles increase.
Skin-tone rendering in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
(Photos for illustration only)
Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
(Photos for illustration only
Average Reflectance (SCI) Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Average reflectance is computed based on the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum range (see graph below) and human spectral sensitivity.
Reflectance (SCI)
Wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color, but also our capacity to see it; for example, UV is a very low wavelength that the human eye cannot see; Infrared is a high wavelength that the human eye also cannot see). White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, i.e. the range the human eye can see. Measurements above show the reflection of the devices within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm).
Uniformity
This graph shows the distribution of luminance throughout the entire display panel. Uniformity is measured with a 20% gray pattern, with bright green indicating ideal luminance. An evenly spread-out bright green color on the screen indicates that the display’s brightness is uniform. Other colors indicate a loss of uniformity.
PWM Frequency Honor Magic6 Pro
4320 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Honor Magic6 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the most important modulation. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue.
Color
147
Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8
How Display Color score is composed
Color evaluations are performed in different lighting conditions to see how well the device manages color with the surrounding environment. Devices are tested with sRGB and Display-P3 image patterns. Both faithful mode and default mode are used for our evaluation. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing & analysis.
White point color under D65 illuminant at 830 lux
English
中文
Camera
Selfie
Audio
Battery
