The Reno6 5G is the junior model in Oppo’s Reno6 range, featuring a MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset, 8GB RAM and 128GB of internal storage. Images can be viewed and composed using a 6.4-inch AMOLED display with FHD+ resolution.
The rear camera combines a 64 MP primary module with an 8 MP ultra-wide and a 2 MP macro lens. In video mode you can record 4K footage at 30 fps or Full-HD at up to 60 fps. Let’s see how the Oppo Reno6 5G performed in our DXOMARK Camera test.
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 64 MP sensor, f/1.7-aperture lens, AF
- Ultra-wide: 8 MP sensor, f/2.2-aperture lens with 120° field-of-view, fixed focus
- Macro: 2 MP sensor, f/2.4-aperture lens, fixed focus
- LED flash
- Video: 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Oppo Reno6 5G
89
camera
93
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
82
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (128)
99
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
85
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
76
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
66
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
55
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
58
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (91)
38
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
81
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
75
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
83
Honor Magic6 Pro
Best: Honor Magic6 Pro (119)
98
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
71
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
88
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Best: Oppo Find X7 Ultra (119)
77
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
100
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (118)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
157
th
7. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
18. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
20. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
20. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
27. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
27. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
31. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
37. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
44. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
44. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
49. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
59. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
59. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
70. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
72. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
72. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
77. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
81. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
81. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
89. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
95. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
95. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
102. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
108. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
111. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
120. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
120. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
124. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
126. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
126. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
126. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
131. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
131. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
136. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
139. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
140. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
141. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
143. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
145. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
152. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
152. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
156. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
158. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
158. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
161. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
161. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
161. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
164. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
166. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
168. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
169. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
171. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
174. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
176. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
178. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
179. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
182. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
182. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
184. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
185. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
187. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
191. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
193. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
200. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
202. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in High-End Ranking
24
th
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
17. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
18. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
19. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
25. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
25. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
27. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
Pros
- Good target exposure in bright light and indoor conditions
- Accurate focus in photo and video modes
- Preview image very similar to final capture
- Nice blur and consistent effect in bokeh mode
- Effective video stabilization in bright light and indoors
- Well-controlled noise in bright light video
Cons
- Tone compression in high-contrast scenes
- Desaturated color in photo and video
- Low detail and occasional local loss of texture
- Shadow noise
- Fusion and ghosting artifacts
- Color fringing on ultra-wide camera
- Noise and loss of fine detail when tele-zooming
- Noise and low detail in indoor and low light video
- Exposure instabilities in video
- Strong sharpness differences between video frames
A DXOMARK Camera score of 107 makes the Oppo Reno6 5G a decent option in the High-End segment ($400-$599) but better alternatives are available. Scores are also lower than on the Pro model in the same series for most categories.
Texture comparison: The Reno6 5G’s level of detail is lower than the competitors’ in most conditions.
When capturing still images the camera usually produces good exposures as long as you don’t shoot in very low light, but exposure is unstable across consecutive shots and tone compression is visible in shots of high-contrast scenes. Colors look often desaturated and color rendering can be slightly inaccurate but on the plus side, the autofocus usually works reliably in all conditions.
In terms of texture and noise, there is some room for improvement, with the level of detail generally low and noise visible in most conditions, especially in the shadow areas of the frame. Our testers also spotted some fusion and ghosting artifacts. Some depth artifacts around the foreground subject are visible when shooting in bokeh simulation mode but overall the bokeh effect is pleasant with a fairly strong blur.
Indoor shot: Accurate exposure, slight
clipping, noise, inaccurate color rendering
Low light shot: underexposure, shadow clipping, noise, low details
When shooting with the ultra-wide camera, image quality and performance are quite similar to the more expensive Reno6 Pro. At 16mm equivalent, the field of view is a little less wide than on the best in class and some image artifacts have a negative impact on image quality. The camera scores pretty low for tele, which is mainly due to the lack of a dedicated tele camera. Detail is low and noise is quite noticeable.
Oppo Reno6 5G, ultra-wide
Oppo Reno6 5G, ultra-wide, crop: limited field of view, low detail, noise
When recording video compared to the competition, exposure can be a little dark, and our testers also observed some exposure instabilities, especially when shooting in bright or low light. Like for stills, color is often desaturated, detail is fairly low, and noise is noticeable. White balance can be a little unstable, too. Video artifacts include judder effect, ringing, and aliasing, but the autofocus is accurate and stabilization is mostly effective, despite some sharpness differences between frames.
Good exposure but strong sharpness differences between frames, clipping and noise, as well as exposure and white
balance instabilities
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.