Panasonic Lumix DC-GX800 sensor review: A mini-GH4

DxOMark Sensor
Panasonic GX800

Although it’s aimed at novice photographers and “selfie-takers”, the Lumix GX800 has the same sensor as the immensely popular Panasonic Lumix GH4 (announced in February 2014). This means the GX800’s Micro Four Thirds (MFT)-type digital Live MOS chip has a pixel count of 16.0 million and no low-pass filter. The sensor is paired with Panasonic’s Venus Engine, which enables a maximum sensitivity setting of ISO 25600, 4K video recording, and Panasonic’s 4K photo mode.

Designed with portability and affordability in mind, the GX800 is very small and doesn’t have a viewfinder built in. The 3.0-inch, 1,040,000-dot touchscreen dominates the rear and has a hinge that allows it to be tipped up through 180 degrees for easier selfie-shooting.

While it has the MFT mount and can be used with an extensive range of optics, the GX800 is often sold with the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 lens, which makes a natural partner, thanks to its small size.

Key specifications:

  • 16Mp MFT-type (17.3 x 13.0mm) Live MOS sensor
  • Venus Engine Processor
  • Tilting 3.0-inch, 1,040,000-dot touchscreen
  • Contrast detection autofocus
  • 6fps continuous shooting with Continuous AF
  • 4K (3840×2160) video
  • Wi-Fi connectivity

Overall image sensor performance

With a respectable overall score of 73, the Panasonic GX800’s sensor is the fifth-highest scoring Panasonic device that we’ve tested to date (the GH5’s sensor is the highest at 77). As usual, the best results are achieved at the GX800’s lowest sensitivity setting of ISO 100, when it captures 13.3 EV dynamic range, 23.3 bits color depth, and has a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 37.9 decibels.

The weakest aspect of the GX800’s performance is its low-light capability, which garnered a score of just ISO 586. This means that the sensitivity needs to be kept below this value to be sure of good image quality.

Image Quality compared

Comparing the GX800’s sensor performance with that of other Panasonic compact system camera sensors reveals how close a match it is for the GH4 — a camera that was over three times the price of the GX800 at launch. However, changes to file processing enable the GX800 to capture about 0.5EV greater dynamic range (Landscape score) than the GH4. Unfortunately, this greater range appears to come at the expense of noise control at the higher sensitivity values.

Click here to open our interactive DxOMark image sensor ranking tool.

The GX800 is one of the most affordable compact system or mirrorless cameras currently available, and with the exception of its low-light performance (Sports score), it competes well with such popular (and more expensive) APS-C format cameras as the Sony A6000.

Click here to open our interactive DxOMark image sensor ranking tool.

In-depth comparisons

Let’s take a closer look at how the GX800 compares with the Canon EOS M100 and the Sony A600, two APS-C format cameras at the more affordable end of the market.

Portrait (Color Depth)

Our analysis reveals that the GX800’s color sensitivity is almost identical to that of the GH4, and at the lowest sensitivity settings, it’s a close match to the Canon M100. However, both the GX800 and the M100 lag behind the Sony A6000 by around a stop.

Above ISO 400, the GX800 color sensitivity begins to decline quite steeply so that it falls further below that of the Canon M100 and the Sony A6000. The biggest difference comes when the GX800 is set to ISO 6400 (measured as ISO 3977), when it achieves a score of 14 bits. The M100 and A6000 don’t drop to this level until they are set to ISO 12,800.

While this might sound dramatic, the differences in practical terms aren’t huge, and all three cameras should be kept to ISO 800 or lower to ensure good color sensitivity (20 bits or higher).

Landscape (Dynamic Range)

Dynamic range, the ability to record a range of tones from very dark to very bright in a single image, is especially important to landscape photographers because their subjects often contain a bright sky and deep shadows. At the lowest sensitivity values favored by these photographers, the GX800’s sensor has a dynamic range of 13.25EV, the highest value of the three cameras — although only by a very small margin.

By ISO 400, however, the GX800 has dropped just a shade below the other two cameras, and the Sony A6000 takes the lead. Up to around ISO 6400, the difference between the GX800’s dynamic range and that of the A6000 is a maximum of about 0.5EV. This is likely to be evident only in scenes with very wide dynamic range, when the GX800 will lose detail in the shadows or highlights just a fraction sooner than the A6000. Above ISO 6400, the gaps widens, peaking at about a stop.

Sports (Low-light)

At its lowest sensitivity setting, the GX800 achieves a signal-to-noise ratio of 37.9dB, whereas our threshold for high image quality is 38dB. When set to ISO 1600 (measured as ISO 920), the SNR slips below our acceptable score of 30dB — a value it achieves at just ISO 586.

In practice, with the sensitivity control set to adjust in steps of 1/3 EV, this means you’ll need to set the ISO to 500 or lower to achieve good image quality. The Canon M100 and the Sony A6000 can both be pushed a stop (1EV) higher.


The Panasonic Lumix GX800 is very small and attractively priced for novice photographers looking for their first interchangeable-lens camera. However, the sensor is showing its age a bit and the image quality is let down by its low-light performance.

This means the GX800 is best suited for use in bright conditions when the sensitivity (ISO) can be kept low. It could be a good travel camera, but it’s not the best all-rounder.

It’s a very compact option with the tiny 12-32mm lens, but for just a little more money, the Canon M100 and Sony A6000 offer better image quality in a wider range of conditions than the GX800.

In this review we have compared the Sony A7 III to its most direct rivals that we’ve tested. As usual, you can create your own comparisons and in-depth analyses using our interactive image sensor ranking tool

  • tom

    ….i still do not get the message: ” the Canon M100 and Sony A6000 offer better image quality in a wider range of conditions than the GX800″… if you see it isolated, that could be the point. but thats only a part of the truth. If you see the whole system it looks quite different…several Sony A 5000-6000 failed with simple technical problems after using them for a while (due to flimsy mechanical construction ), the still do not have a comprehensive lens range (but a mixture of Zeiss branded, overpriced glass..), and Canon still has to release some interesting lenses… it is not fair and correct to use the market power and influence of dxo mark as an institution to communicate such biased and not-comprehensive report(S). If you see the whole package, the mFT universe is as powerful as aps-c up to 800 Iso … and actually: how many photos are made in darkness???

    • Dear Tom,
      DxOMark is an independent company with no preferences for any specific equipment makers. We have designed our DxOMark scoring system with at least, one obsession: develop and implement test protocols which can be accurately repeated time after time, so that all devices we test are treated the same way.
      Our test is merely based on this protocol and issues such as user experiences and model technical problems are not included.
      Thank you,

  • Gov

    When will the G9 be tested? It seems more interesting than the GX800…

  • Brzolka

    I would never buy this because the contrast-detection autofocus fails regularly. I’d rather pay double the price for a Sony RX100 V just to get their phase-detection autofocus, because without it the camera is failing to provide basic functionality on the most basic level and will have endless problems recording video or focusing in any non-contrasty or medium-low light situation. So the real question is, when will Panasonic finally have PDAF?

    • MrWalker1000

      how does this camera compare to rx100 mark 3?

  • Raist3d

    Does this mean the GX850/GX800/GF9 will finally be supported in DXo PhotoLab? Been waiting a while for that. Thanks.

  • Raist3d

    Also there’s something very odd about these results. Generally I find DXo is spot on with my experience but every now and then something comes along that seems off and this is one of them. I don’t find the GX800 having a sub-par advantage to the GM5 (723 Sports score). Nor do I find the GX800 with vastly more DR than the GM5 (GM5 rated at around 11.1 which doesn’t make sense at all).

    Probably what happened is Dxo tested the GM5 with the electronic shutter, which cuts the RAW down to 10bit from 12-bit but didn’t notice (thus the much lower DR rating). I find these cameras pretty comparable, with a tiny edge to the GX800 for not having the AA filter, but not the differences your review implies.

  • Michal

    This thing has more dynamic range than any Fujifilm X camera!!! Good job Panasonic

  • MrWalker1000

    any photography fans here…how does this compare to rx100 3 or 2?

  • To me, this is the best looking truly compact ILC on the market. I wish it was taken more seriously (i.e. give it the latest sensor and a pop-up EVF, etc.). This would be a great little camera truly light enough to hang around your neck without bothering.

    If this camera had the Olympus OMD-EM1 II’s sensor, it’d be like a crop ILC version of Sony’s amazing RX1. How come ultra-portable large sensor cameras are either pushed to the very bottom of the barrel (like here) or stuffed into a tiny and expensive niche (like the RX1)?

We are hiring!