The Xiaomi 11T came out in October 2021. It is part of our High-End ($400-$599) segment and comes with such features as a 108 MP main camera. Let’s take a look at some of its key battery test results.
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
- 67W charger
- 6.67-inch, 1080 x 2400, 120 Hz OLED display
- MediaTek Dimensity 1200-Ultra (6 nm) chipset
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Xiaomi 11T
136
battery
142
Honor X7d (400 Smart)
Best: Honor X7d (400 Smart) (254)
113
Motorola Edge 70 Max
Best: Motorola Edge 70 Max (206)
128
Honor X7d (400 Smart)
Best: Honor X7d (400 Smart) (211)
130
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)
161
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)
139
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
124
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
Key performances
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
7h57 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking

38
th
1. Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)
168
9. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
17. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
18. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
27. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
142
37. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
137
38. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
38. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
48. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
134
48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
52. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
52. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
52. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
67. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
67. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
130
69. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
69. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
69. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
69. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
78. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
127
87. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
95. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
95. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
101. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
119
105. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
118
105. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
118
110. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
110. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
118. Crosscall Stellar-X5
115
122. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
114
122. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
114
127. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
131. Motorola Moto G62 5G
112
135. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
135. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
135. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
141. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
109
141. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
109
145. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
149. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
149. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
107
151. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
155. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
158. Motorola moto g34 5G
102
162. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
162. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
164. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
164. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
169. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
169. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
169. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
174. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
174. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
178. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
181. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
181. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
181. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
186. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
188. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
188. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
191. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
192. Motorola moto g54 5G
90
192. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
198. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
200. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
204. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Position in High-End Ranking

15
th
4. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
23. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
30. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
32. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
34. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
35. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
40. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
42. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
Pros
- Very well-balanced device
- Excellent autonomy for this segment (59 hours of moderate use)
- Gains 8 hours of autonomy when charged with 60% or less remaining capacity
Cons
- Takes 3.5 minutes to start charging at peak power
- Low autonomy when using GPS navigation
- When battery gauge shows 20% charge remaining, only 16.4% is really left
At 89, the Xiaomi 11T shares joint second place with the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, the Vivo Y72 5G, and the OnePlus Nord CE 5G in our database as of this writing.
We compared the Xiaomi 11T’s performance in several key categories with two other devices in our High-End segment, the Oppo Reno6 5G (currently first place in our database) and the Realme GT 5G; battery capacity, tested charger, display type and resolution, and processor specifications for the three devices are shown in the table below.
|
Xiaomi 11T |
Oppo Reno6 5G |
Realme GT 5G |
| Battery capacity (mAh) |
5000 |
4300 |
4500 |
| Charger |
67W |
65W |
65W |
| Display type |
OLED |
OLED |
OLED |
| Display resolution |
1080×2400 |
1080×2400 |
1080×2400 |
| Chipset |
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
MediaTek Dimensity 900 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
Autonomy (73)
How long a battery charge lasts depends not only on battery capacity but also on other aspects of the phone’s hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (1) Stationary, (2) On the go, and (3) Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
85h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
59h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
37h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
The Xiaomi 11T and the Oppo Reno6 tie for overall autonomy, and this is despite the Reno6 5G’s having a battery with 14% less capacity than the Xiaomi. The Realme GT 5G comes in quite a ways behind the other two in this comparison.
Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

78
th
2. Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)
99h
13. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
78h
14. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
16. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
24. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
32. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
36. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
69h
37. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
69h
39. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
41. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
43. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
44. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
67h
45. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
51. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
53. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
56. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
62. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
66. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
67. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
68. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
71. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
90. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
97. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
56h
99. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
102. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
103. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
113. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
54h
114. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
54h
118. Motorola moto g54 5G
53h
120. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
53h
126. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
52h
137. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
51h
141. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
142. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
148. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
150. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
151. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
156. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
49h
158. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
159. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
160. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
161. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
163. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
165. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
168. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
169. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
170. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
171. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
173. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
46h
174. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
176. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
181. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
184. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
186. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
187. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
189. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
191. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
192. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
194. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
195. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
198. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
201. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
203. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Position in High-End Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

14
th
11. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
20. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
23. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
24. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
25. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
34. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
36. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
38. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
42. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
Stationary
Vivo Y72 5G
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
The Xiaomi and the Oppo performed very similarly during our TUS tests, with both lasting 67 hours (more than 10 hours longer than the Realme). The Xiaomi managed power better at night, but its battery indicator is not accurate. When the 11T’s gauge shows 20% charge remaining, there is really only 16.4% left. The Oppo’s gauge is more accurate, which gave it the edge over the Xiaomi here.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
On the go
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outside and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary for each device.
With the exception of calls, the Xiaomi 11T put in a disappointing performance in our mobility tests for all cases with its screen on: it is below average for social apps, navigation, and camera among all phones tested in our database so far, and comes in behind the Oppo and Realme devices.
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
Calibrated
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
Turning in an excellent performance here, the 11T just edges the Reno6 5G and soundly beats the GT 5G in our calibrated use cases.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
Charging (97)
The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, Full charge and Quick boost. Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long it takes to charge a battery from zero to 80% capacity and from 80 to 100%; and measure how long and how much power the battery takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual full charge. With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes.
All three smartphones in this comparison support fast charging. The Xiaomi 11T delivers a great charging experience, but with their smaller batteries, its competitors did even better.
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
Full charge
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (121)
When fully depleted, and like its stablemate 11T Pro, the Xiaomi 11T takes 3.5 minutes to get out of slow charging mode and reach peak charging (phones typically exit slow charging in a few seconds). In addition, the Xiaomi charger reaches maximum power (measured at 64W, not 67W) for only a few seconds and quickly starts to decrease. Meanwhile, its Oppo and Realme rivals turn on quickly and stay at their maximum power for at least four minutes. Moreover, they take only around 34 minutes to achieve a full charge, whereas the Xiaomi takes 46 minutes.
Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

56
th
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
24. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
75. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
0h37
76. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
80. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
0h38
81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
84. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
86. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
93. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
0h42
98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
102. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
0h46
103. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
104. Motorola Edge 70 Max
0h47
105. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
108. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
0h48
110. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
112. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
113. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
114. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
0h49
115. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
118. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
122. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
0h51
123. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
124. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
126. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
126. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
128. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
129. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
0h52
130. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
131. Apple iPhone 12 mini
0h52
133. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
134. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
136. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
137. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
140. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
140. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
142. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
0h54
143. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
0h54
144. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
0h54
145. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
146. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
0h56
147. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
148. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
150. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
151. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
152. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
153. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
154. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
157. Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)
0h60
161. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
165. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
171. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
176. Honor X7d (400 Smart)
1h10
178. Motorola moto g34 5G
1h12
180. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
182. Crosscall Stellar-X5
1h20
186. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
188. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
191. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
192. Motorola moto g54 5G
1h26
193. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
194. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
201. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Position in High-End Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

16
th
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
11. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
30. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
31. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
32. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
33. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
34. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
40. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
Quick boost
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
Although it is eclipsed by the Oppo Reno6 5G’s performance, the Xiaomi 11T device nonetheless posts an excellent score here, providing 8 hours of additional autonomy gain when charging for 5 minutes with at any level under 60% power remaining. This is not the case for either the Oppo or the Realme devices; for them, the higher the percentage of power remaining when quick boosting, the less autonomy they gain.
| |
| Xiaomi 11T | Oppo Reno6 5G | Realme GT 5G |
| Autonomy boost (hh:mm) | 20% | 7:55 | 11:35 | 7:47 |
| 40% | 7:53 | 10:12 | 7:20 |
| 60% | 8:03 | 7:12 | 5:07 |
| 80% | 4:45 | 5:32 | 3:45 |
| Percentage boost | 20% | 16.9 % | 24.7 % | 21.7 % |
| 40% | 16.8 % | 21.8 % | 20.5 % |
| 60% | 17.2 % | 15.4 % | 14.3 % |
| 80% | 10.1 % | 11.8 % | 10.5 % |
| Energy consumed | 20% | 4110 mWh | 5060 mWh | 4783 mWh |
| 40% | 4087 mWh | 4457 mWh | 4505 mWh |
| 60% | 4174 mWh | 3151 mWh | 3148 mWh |
| 80% | 2466 mWh | 2417 mWh | 2308 mWh |
Efficiency (85)
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario testing, outdoor mobility testing, charging evaluation, and power measurements, and then take into consideration the device’s battery capacity.
The Xiaomi 11T is a well-balanced device, racking up robust scores in both charge up and discharge.
Charge up
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
The Xiaomi 11T’s adapter is very efficient, with low residual power drain whether the phone is plugged in or unplugged.
Discharge
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (121)
The Xiaomi 11T achieved excellent results for discharge efficiency, thanks to low discharge current in most calibrated uses.
Conclusion
The Xiaomi 11T is an excellent and very well-balanced device overall, performing well in our TUS tests and particularly well in our calibrated autonomy tests. Users can expect nearly 2.5 days of autonomy with moderate use; further, the 11T offers a pleasing and fast charging experience.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.